Composition
What is actually in there
The catch consisted of 525 fish from seven species and took 269 hours. Two species made up 79 percent of the catch: the bluegill and the brown bullhead. A sunfish and a catfish, both common ones and both able to tolerate warm, murky water.
The ordinary state is the result. This kind of pond is what is normally expected of a healthy suburban stormwater pond in Virginia and shows no signs of being in a distressed condition or being anything special.
Bluegill were caught in all 48 sessions during four summers—they being the only species to never fail to appear..
The hook-and-line sample illustrates the make-up of the fish caught from a specific section of the bank, not the actual composition of the fish species inhabiting the pond. As small fish, the bottom-dwelling minnows, and juvenile fish are not caught by this technique, they are absent from the figures mentioned above, and it is therefore necessary to regard each of the figures as referring to the catch and not as showing a full population census.
Predator and prey
A working ratio, not a demonstrated cycle
The figures show a ratio of about 7 bluegill for every largemouth bass, that is to say 257 to 38, since there is a plentiful supply of food and only a small number of predators.
A warmwater pond is only able to achieve ecological balance if it has both kinds of fish — a large enough number of bluegill to serve as food for the bass and enough bass to control the bluegill population. When this balance is disrupted there is an excess of bluegill, which causes their growth to be stunted because of the greater competition for the limited resources, and these smaller bluegill then eat the aquatic insects that usually feed on algae.
The fact that this pattern is a sign of a well-developed aquatic community and has been seen consistently over four successive summers, not just in one year.
Why a pond manager would care
The insects and algae form part of the fish's diet and thus help to keep the fishery in good condition at the same time as making the water clearer and lowering the basin's operating costs; this is precisely the aim of a stormwater facility. The volunteers can carry out seasonal monitoring using nothing more than a rod and a notebook.
That is not a ratio since a ratio only gives a snapshot of how the population is made up and says nothing about predator–prey interactions. In order to observe coupled oscillation—that is, to see predators increase when prey decrease and vice versa—one needs population figures over time, not just the number of fish that were caught. When the numbers of bass and bluegill are looked at directly during each session, there is no correlation between them (ρ = −0.08, p = 0.57), and this is exactly what one would expect because the fish caught in the afternoon are those that were feeding at that time, not a reflection of how many there actually were in the area.
Water quality
Bottom-feeders and the carp question
It is tempting to think that bottom-feeding fish are of benefit to a pond since they disturb the sediment; however, with regard to common carp the current science indicates the opposite.
Carp feed by digging into the bottom sediment; this action leads to fine particles being resuspended, increases the turbidity, and causes the nutrients — which particularly include phosphorus — to be released back into the water. In a basin which is intended to allow the sediment to settle down and to take in fertilizer runoff from residences before it flows downstream, this has the effect of going against the purpose for which it was designed since it causes more phosphorus to become available, which in turn results in more algae growing and means that more nutrients are exported to Cub Run rather than fewer.
The usual opinion is that common carp should be managed and kept under control in stormwater ponds and that they should not be considered to be of any advantage; in this particular pond, however, that caution is only partly correct since the carp are there but never reach the levels at which they now cause a problem.
The fish in the pond make up only a small portion of the total catch — accounting for 3.4 percent and missing from 33 of the 48 sessions. While they are worth keeping an eye on, they do not currently form a problem.
The idea — despite the fact that an early version of the project had stated that bottom-feeders aerated the sediment and were therefore beneficial to the pond — is wrong when it comes to carp since their habit of uprooting reduces clarity and results in the recycling of phosphorus.
In a later version it was stated that there were 84 carp and one koi, and an argument concerning the release of the ornamental fish had been based on that figure. The numbers had come from a catch log in which the species had been incorrectly assigned to the proper columns. On considering the correct record, the number of carp is found to be 18 and the argument about the release of the ornamental fish has now completely been withdrawn.
Mosquitoes
The claim this record cannot settle
People believe that the stormwater pond will have mosquitoes since they see standing water in the summer, and the typical reply is that the small fish eat the mosquito larvae.
They receive more attention than usual. While mosquitoes usually prefer shallow, stagnant water containing no fish — such as a blocked gutter or an old tire — rather than a permanent pond with 525 fish that serve as predators, there are genuine doubts about the effectiveness of mosquitofish (Gambusia), and it is known that this species can harm native amphibians and invertebrates in areas where it has been introduced.
When the dipper and the white tray are taken out of the shallow edges at the same time as on Saturday, a quantity that can be measured is obtained. This door is the cheapest of the unopened doors in the project and shows the limitation.
Sources to verify against
Don't take our word for it
The claims made on this page regarding the ecosystem are given in a general and well-established manner. Although they are presented as settled, you should check the details against the original sources and quote them directly:
- Fairfax County Stormwater Planning — pond management for this jurisdiction
- Virginia Cooperative Extension — pond and fisheries management, carp and aquatic vegetation guidance
- Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources — warmwater pond balance, bluegill–bass ratios, stocking
- Northern Virginia Regional Commission — Occoquan Reservoir water quality and salinity reporting
- US Geological Survey and peer-reviewed limnology — common carp effects on turbidity and phosphorus release; diurnal pH and dissolved-oxygen cycling