The site
How the record was made
Bluegill — 257 fish, every session
Catfish and bullhead — 190 fish
Largemouth bass — 38 fish
What the method cannot count
Most of what lives here is not in the data
In the photographs referred to below there are two things which four years' worth of catch records fail to mention. The first of these is a school of small fish at the surface—a size class that a baited hook is simply incapable of catching. The second is a snapping turtle, an aquatic predator that is hunting the same animals which this study was counting.
This example is the best on the website of a limitation which is mentioned throughout the site: the account explains what takes a hook from one section of bank, and that is a far narrower matter than what exists in the pond.
An honest catch log cannot be considered a census, and the gap in question is considerable. The fact that dozens of small fish are seen in a single frame while only eleven golden shiners are recorded in the entire account, together with a predator large enough to eat them which is completely absent — this is the most straightforward way of illustrating the point, which is why these photographs are being published rather than being kept as off-topic.
On identification
The individual who caught them was able to identify the species without using a identification key and usually did so within a few seconds; in fact it is quite difficult to distinguish between sunfish of the genus Lepomis since their colour varies with sex, season and stress, there is overlap in appearance between several species and they easily hybridise in small ponds.
If a photograph by itself is not enough to confirm what was recorded, the caption is used to make this point rather than providing a more detailed account with a degree of confidence that the image does not justify.